Trump’s war in Iran: Deadly sanctions & erratic decisions by a “hollow shell” administration


The Trump administration’s approach towards Iran can be characterized as a combination of deadly sanctions and erratic decision-making, all within the context of what some critics describe as a “hollow shell” administration. Throughout his presidency, Donald Trump pursued a policy of maximum pressure on Iran, which primarily involved imposing severe economic sanctions on the country.

These deadly sanctions, aimed at crippling Iran’s economy, were imposed after the United States unilaterally withdrew from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran nuclear deal, in 2018. The Trump administration argued that the deal was flawed and failed to address Iran’s regional activities and ballistic missile program adequately. Critics, however, argue that the withdrawal from the JCPOA and the subsequent imposition of sanctions only escalated tensions and increased the risk of conflict.

In addition to the sanctions, Trump’s administration made several erratic decisions regarding Iran, which raised concerns about the stability and coherence of its Iran policy. One such decision was the targeted killing of Qasem Soleimani, a prominent Iranian military figure, in January 2020. The move, which was justified by the administration as a necessary response to imminent threats against American interests, further heightened tensions between the two nations and nearly led to a full-scale military conflict.

Critics argue that the Trump administration lacked a clear and strategic vision for dealing with Iran, leading to a perceived hollowness in its approach. The administration’s actions were seen by many as lacking a coherent long-term strategy, with some suggesting that the decisions were driven by personal grievances or political considerations rather than a well-thought-out plan.

Overall, Trump’s war in Iran, as characterized by deadly sanctions and erratic decisions, contributed to a volatile and unpredictable relationship between the two countries. The long-term consequences of these actions are yet to be fully understood, but they undoubtedly shaped the dynamics of U.S.-Iran relations during his presidency.